From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Dec 25 02:01:29 2014
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21CF46D3;
 Thu, 25 Dec 2014 02:01:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC87D3541;
 Thu, 25 Dec 2014 02:01:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
 id 96FC356083; Wed, 24 Dec 2014 20:01:27 -0600 (CST)
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2014 20:01:27 -0600
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To: Kevin Lo <kevlo@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r375390 - in head/net/ifstated: . files
Message-ID: <20141225020127.GA21260@lonesome.com>
References: <201412240559.sBO5xXKA011201@svn.freebsd.org>
 <20141224125108.GA20688@FreeBSD.org>
 <20141225011917.GA11472@ns.kevlo.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20141225011917.GA11472@ns.kevlo.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>,
 svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head
 <svn-ports-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2014 02:01:29 -0000

On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 09:19:17AM +0800, Kevin Lo wrote:
> > > -PORTEPOCH=	2
> > > +PORTEPOCH=	3
> > 
> > Pardon me??
> 
> 	Kevin

Uh, you've just sent PORTEPOCH backwards, which means that anyone who
built from the port during the time it was set to 3 will never get any
updates at all.

I agree it shouldn't have been incremented in the first place, but
aren't we stuck with it now?

mcl