From owner-freebsd-chat Sat Nov 2 23:00:57 1996 Return-Path: owner-chat Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id XAA01489 for chat-outgoing; Sat, 2 Nov 1996 23:00:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from freenet.hamilton.on.ca (main.freenet.hamilton.on.ca [199.212.94.65]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA01460 for ; Sat, 2 Nov 1996 23:00:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca (james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca [199.212.94.66]) by freenet.hamilton.on.ca (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA05753; Sun, 3 Nov 1996 02:00:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (ac199@localhost) by james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id CAA28097; Sun, 3 Nov 1996 02:02:40 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca: ac199 owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 3 Nov 1996 02:02:40 -0500 (EST) From: Tim Vanderhoek To: jack cc: obrien@cs.ucdavis.edu, chat@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD hacker dinner report... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-chat@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sun, 3 Nov 1996, jack wrote: > On Sat, 2 Nov 1996 obrien@cs.ucdavis.edu wrote: > > > But has anyone thought of the security implications of either SFTP or the > > DTP? Could someone put mushrooms in my spaghetti in route??? Yuck! :-) > > Not to worry, you'll have the option of either DES or PGP encryption. So does this mean the food would have to be made outside of the US, then sent to the US, and then SFTP'd to all those German hackers? Do they have pizza in Germany? ;) (Not to neglect the Australian who started this, I think) -- Outnumbered? Maybe. Outspoken? Never! tIM...HOEk