From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 14 23:04:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ADAA106566C; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 23:04:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.e.sanliturk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD00E8FC0C; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 23:04:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws11 with SMTP id 11so8181904vws.13 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:04:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=LgBGur0G2QiX++a1sSF8kNcbXaDlJQs9CEFw0UtBEIg=; b=Ucib1YFuFsmhMp3nKP5QDd92gk7f/+mWXzs1XoZMzmgxU/Ir8FVzRTk8MonA2qcJ5U Ibj1WIgy/ySPoXPE+/Iq4K1LbiIDSYHmhDuAdcYx+h21MzeF16gzNJwEK/9tRrvibOSG cD5qm7x+c9qpgMB8Eugh3wbOfW26o8EZnEKgA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.194.5 with SMTP id dw5mr15575617qab.16.1321311860997; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:04:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.73.195 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:04:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20111114220953.GE1455@elvis.mu.org> References: <201111140101.pAE11XEa067064@mail.karels.net> <201111140802.13355.jhb@freebsd.org> <20111114193434.GC2164@hoeg.nl> <20111114220953.GE1455@elvis.mu.org> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:04:20 -0500 Message-ID: From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk To: Alfred Perlstein Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Ed Schouten , Doug Barton , mike@karels.net, Tim Kientzle , arch@freebsd.org, Robert Watson , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The strangeness called `sbin' X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 23:04:22 -0000 On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > I'd just like to throw in my regular bit of sacrilege and ask > if what we would be moving to would conform to any standard, > perhaps a linux or sysv model, otherwise a departure from BSD > "standards" to something totally new seems really unwise if all > we are aiming to do is reduce the number of directories in $PATH. > > -Alfred > > * Mehmet Erol Sanliturk [111114 13:57] wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Ed Schouten wrote: > > > > > -- > > > Ed Schouten > > > WWW: http://80386.nl/ > > > > > > > > > > > Mehmet Erol Sanliturk > > -- > - Alfred Perlstein > .- VMOA #5191, 03 vmax, 92 gs500, 85 ch250, 07 zx10 > .- FreeBSD committer > Please , notice that - Physical layout is different from logical layout . By proper mount statements it is possible to generate conventional FreeBSD directory layout from any physical layout . - Needs define tools . To stick to rules which does not fulfill requirements of needs causes change of the tools . Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk