From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Sep 20 13:44:31 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81268109D4E3 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 13:44:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C7E78DC10 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 13:44:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D5483109D4DE; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 13:44:30 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3E75109D4DC for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 13:44:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from mail-yb1-xb35.google.com (mail-yb1-xb35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67C638DC0B for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 13:44:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by mail-yb1-xb35.google.com with SMTP id 5-v6so3923450ybf.3 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 06:44:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=4PYyBBhSFd/IrJa6yZgGqO5Z2JlKj8ix8hOgRP6LOPk=; b=IPw/A41PVcPlSBfrpYBAV8N/WiBQzPDKIZHRDt7ZtAgLwbJ/NKBNYLBaV7jJVU9L7w 9HBrjJ0qMF7GleO9QqSWmyQ76zzqVayL8Cdc00JISUM/TEPApYMFPL1Hcdp8wpBE8nFQ fVgcOjwHfh6EokwPnPoiaNnWlhpSye4ty3Bt8Zi/8xsgd+StdLu8EbJ+kh10Ov+ScXPm k7RpMnptGuWADPcGLopKKEpmTbYK1MB6k2I39tDDm6MwK+7aCULNwb1hQj71ofmb5OAX p+SInjtfPN8B1LJHgUl5JC+HtN+kZB0NacM0yox3JWC0wI8DMOdhpq3rpd8N6G1CE4QI y8lA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4PYyBBhSFd/IrJa6yZgGqO5Z2JlKj8ix8hOgRP6LOPk=; b=o6cE8XxCWTaVadNSyCZTHF0/s0fLMYU3MQ5LHS7DDBWThnBYuq2EShqrGQD7s8AHuo vTfCor0ZmMFrJ5XrgwvBT3uMiRe/BQO3RUvTjtI4Y3HW8dg5zXnoGvAdW0YRmiLI92AR XqH4QWyDkllKKYwh/ToeawdcsNTeOZ1E+lQGJGibYW37HrxsSd6qQXYBIRDedTxe8+VL OSBwFXLP43jNUUTxbTsFYcNNRCW+BaFkiHweCcEvEVlhQN7Pv0L+S2fSR2RM3L6eDV/P 6/wNd648ut0msz753qTz76QXrX0gI6iN/+5WDgGMSnN6w2fHD41sMdpIrd5WesV4ZaUD Msqw== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51BxviUm92FNsqsgOsRVFDyofcD0hJISaMFU7GHnJfu3WYHcd4xl o0KemtjtRAVUjY3Kxc/+8Ey+1puDzl+rog8tTrvcSw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdZMDDKXs7DWIihDaclXd9AgfC8f+BmH04rx04hGyZMlUicZvF9sXrc/XHxaTZIQFSSMXtw7aWHUFssseAebicc= X-Received: by 2002:a25:3b58:: with SMTP id i85-v6mr623890yba.197.1537451069847; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 06:44:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <044E02B5-BE6D-4D90-96A4-B2C555707F1C@lastsummer.de> In-Reply-To: From: Adam Weinberger Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 07:44:13 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: net/ntopng: version jump by an order of magnitude To: koobs@freebsd.org Cc: franco@lastsummer.de, ports@freebsd.org, madpilot@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 13:44:31 -0000 On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 9:32 PM Kubilay Kocak wrote: > > On 20/09/2018 6:40 am, Franco Fichtner wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Small question: > > > > https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-ports/commit/0585180d > > > > ... has a typo in the version number which was an ISO date > > originally. Are we using this new date format now or is there > > going to be a PORTEPOCH amendment? > > Up to the maintainer ultimately. > > To avoid PORTEPOCH, either the typo'd datestamp scheme (0XX for month) > would need to continue until 3.7, or an alternate scheme created that is > both meaningful and > than (pkg version -t old new) the current value. > > Or fix the typo and add PORTEPOCH. > > Personally, I'd go the first option as it's only a minor typo that > doesn't affect ongoing existing-scheme version updates, and is the more > transient of the two (PORTEPOCH lives forever, bad scheme only lasts > till 3.7). > > > > > Cheers, > > Franco The 'd' is arbitrary. If a different, higher letter were used, the date could be fixed. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org