From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 22 21:47:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E5C816A4CE for ; Sat, 22 Nov 2003 21:47:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from canning.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B045E43FDF for ; Sat, 22 Nov 2003 21:47:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: from wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by canning.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 959CD2A8EB; Sat, 22 Nov 2003 21:47:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Mark Linimon In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 21:47:50 -0800 From: Peter Wemm Message-Id: <20031123054750.959CD2A8EB@canning.wemm.org> cc: Richard Coleman cc: "boyd, rounin" cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: /bin and /sbin are now dynamically linked X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 05:47:53 -0000 Mark Linimon wrote: > > Is this where we start swapping stories about "when I was a young > > sysadmin, we didn't need no stinkin vi. We used ed and liked it!". :-) > > No, this is where we, out of respect for the mbox size of our fellow > readers of -current, take this thread to -chat. > > Please. You know, its never been done on our mailing lists that I can remember, but this thread is certainly one that I'm seriously thinking of killing at the mailing list gateway for the first time. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5