From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 04:39:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBC4116A4CE; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 04:39:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E8B43D31; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 04:39:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bright@elvis.mu.org) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192) id BCF5F5C90F; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:39:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:39:28 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Alan Cox Message-ID: <20041001043928.GN39252@elvis.mu.org> References: <20040930091814.GG39252@elvis.mu.org> <20041001041919.GC16408@cs.rice.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041001041919.GC16408@cs.rice.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: alc@freebsd.org cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: aio patch for review. X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 04:39:29 -0000 * Alan Cox [040930 21:19] wrote: > On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 02:18:14AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > properly cover the socket buffer for operations that need locking. > > > > Just to be clear, your point is that soreadable() and sowriteable() > should be performed with the corresponding socket buffer locked. > Correct? If so, yes, please go ahead and commit it. Yup. thank you, -- - Alfred Perlstein - Research Engineering Development Inc. - email: bright@mu.org cell: 408-480-4684