Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 23:54:57 +0200 From: Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org, x11@freebsd.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org, miwi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: graphics/libGL regression on sparc64 Message-ID: <20120715215457.GV63893@alchemy.franken.de> In-Reply-To: <20120715032150.GA24257@lonesome.com> References: <20120619104247.GA13630@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20120630121634.GA94551@alchemy.franken.de> <20120709094958.GB52954@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20120709130430.GN63893@alchemy.franken.de> <20120714133313.GA93858@alchemy.franken.de> <20120715032150.GA24257@lonesome.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 10:21:50PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 03:33:13PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote: > > Given that I haven't received any feedback on the above mentioned > > dri_libGL_libdrm.diff so far, I'm going to commit it on June 16th > > unless someone comes up with an objection and given that I can > > get an approval from a ports committer. > > You're going to wait a whole 11 months? :-) > > In any case, I'm also toying around with arm builds, and of course arm > needs yet another special case added. I haven't looked at fixing anything besides powerpc and sparc64 as AFAIK we don't support graphics hardware on anything except x86 and these two architectures. > Would you object if I wanted to fix that and then test these patches > on an -exp run on amd64? They're just intrusive enough to make me > nervous about the tier-1 machines. > Certainly not; note that at least the patch in PR 169874 apparently misses the extra patches though. Marius
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120715215457.GV63893>