From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Mar 14 18: 0:48 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from sonic.digital-web.net (sonic.digital-web.net [216.65.27.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07DBD15BF4 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 1999 18:00:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from joseph@randomnetworks.com) Received: from localhost (jmscott@localhost) by sonic.digital-web.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA21005; Sun, 14 Mar 1999 20:57:05 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 20:57:04 -0500 (EST) From: Joseph Scott X-Sender: jmscott@sonic.digital-web.net Reply-To: Joseph Scott To: Andreas Klemm Cc: Joseph Scott , freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG, de-bsd-chat@DE.FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD 3.1 SMP outperforms SuSE 6.0 SMP by factor 2.3 !!! In-Reply-To: <19990315020909.A1841@titan.klemm.gtn.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 15 Mar 1999, Andreas Klemm wrote: > > Would it be possible for you to run the same tests with the 2.2 > > kernel? I would think that regardless of the label ( "stable", "current", > > etc ) the 2.2 kernel would be the one most people would put up against > > FBSD 3.1 > > No, have no such system up and running. 3.1 is -STABLE now, 2.x is > not supported anymore. And ... 2.x doesn't have SMP... Sorry, I should have been more specific, the LINUX 2.2 kernel, not the FBSD one. > > -- > Andreas Klemm http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas > News : FreeBSD 3.1 SMP outperforms SuSE Linux 6.0 SMP by 230% !!! > See : http://www.freebsd.org/~andreas/benches/index.html > http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~fsmp/SMP/akgraph-a/graph1.html > Joseph Scott joseph@randomnetworks.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message