Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 18:23:55 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: platanthera <platanthera@web.de> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: COPTFLAGS (not?) only for compiling the kernel? Message-ID: <20040515012355.GA14897@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <200405150303.31682.platanthera@web.de> References: <200405132329.07892.platanthera@web.de> <20040513220325.GC2334@gothmog.gr> <200405150303.31682.platanthera@web.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 03:03:31AM +0200, platanthera wrote: > quite confusing that uncommenting the example settings in make.conf=20 > changes exactly nothing, since these are the (undocumented?) system=20 > defaults anyway. probably a doc issue?=20 > - or just my stupidity .-) Error in your expectations. It's standard the UNIX world over for the default configuration files to document the default settings. Kris --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFApXEqWry0BWjoQKURAqUMAKDBJZ2z0fyk1kW1hMEqj7sHfJSevgCdHPc8 XqQQVbgiIf5ILmGo3aq8R08= =icmg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040515012355.GA14897>