From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 11 09:50:36 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CF5F16A4BF; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 09:50:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.clickcom.com (mx2.clickcom.com [209.198.22.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF45643FE5; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 09:50:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jsmailing@clickcom.com) Received: from aesop (calefaction.clickcom.com [209.198.22.19]) by mx1.clickcom.com (email) with ESMTP id 0EA3B57545; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 12:50:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "John Straiton" To: "'Chris Pressey'" Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 12:45:16 -0400 Message-ID: <00ac01c37884$1a5d6390$1916c60a@win2k.clickcom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2727.1300 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <20030911090023.40d3f497.cpressey@catseye.mine.nu> cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Performance Problems.. Server hardware smoked by $500 box? X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 16:50:36 -0000 > > I'm pretty confused right now with trying to determine the > nature of a > > performance problem I'm having on one of my servers. The > server is a > > webserver with a separate db/file server sitting behind it. > The issue > > is that in pulling up websites from the machine, my silly POS > > development box has nearly double performance although one > would think > > it shouldn't. [...] > > Disclaimer: these are random, uninformed guesses... > > - Is it possible the server has too much RAM? I'll look into this. > - Are you using the same db server as the backend for your > development box? Thanks for your suggestions, unfortunately- yes, both scenerios in production (webserver + db server or db server acting as both) are slower than the development box serving off of the db server. There are no local services other than apache on the development machine. John Straiton jks@ clickcom.com Clickcom, Inc 704-365-9970x101