From owner-freebsd-chat Wed Sep 3 14:37:34 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA09104 for chat-outgoing; Wed, 3 Sep 1997 14:37:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kalypso.cybercom.net (kalypso.cybercom.net [209.21.136.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA09098 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 1997 14:37:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from atlanta (mfd-dial1-11.cybercom.net [209.21.137.11]) by kalypso.cybercom.net (8.8.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id RAA18422 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 1997 17:36:59 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.19970903173303.009f0e10@cybercom.net> X-Sender: ksmm@cybercom.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.3 (32) Date: Wed, 03 Sep 1997 17:33:03 -0400 To: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG From: The Classiest Man Alive Subject: Re: The GUI debate In-Reply-To: <19970903220427.23767@grendel.IAEhv.nl> References: <199709030739.AAA00286@rah.star-gate.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 10:04 PM 9/3/97 +0200, Peter Korsten wrote: >The two - text install and graphical install - aren't mutually >exclusive. If I may draw our friends from Redmond, WA into the >picture again, they start with a text install (on three floppies) >and only after that start with the CD-ROM and the graphics. That would be my thought -- not that the installation program has to fit on a floppy. (Nice, but not essential.) But the boot floppy (or floppies) should have enough to bootstrap the CD-ROM, which could have something more lavish. K.S.