From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Sep  3 19:52:29 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id TAA11171
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 3 Sep 1995 19:52:29 -0700
Received: from UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU (UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU [129.7.1.11])
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with SMTP id TAA11162
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 3 Sep 1995 19:52:26 -0700
Received: from Taronga.COM by UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU with UUCP id AA12235
  (5.67a/IDA-1.5 for hackers@freebsd.org); Sun, 3 Sep 1995 21:47:00 -0500
Received: (from peter@localhost) by bonkers.taronga.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id VAA06904; Sun, 3 Sep 1995 21:20:36 -0500
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 1995 21:20:36 -0500
From: peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva)
Message-Id: <199509040220.VAA06904@bonkers.taronga.com>
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: disklabel and file system differences between 1.1 and 2.0.5...
Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

In the course of upgrading to 2.0.5 I have reached a point where I want to
access the "old" system, which is still 1.1.5.1.

I have to mount the 1.1 file systems ro, because they're dirty. I don't
want to try fsck-ing them from 2.0.5, lest that break something. 1.1.5.1
doesn't see 2.0.5 file systems at all.

Will it?

Also, there seem to be differences in the dislabel. Again, I don't want
to redisklabel it for 2.0.5 until I'm ready to switch over from 1.1.

What are the differences, and which way should I go?