From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 14 22:18:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E148F16A4CE for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 22:18:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.vicor-nb.com (bigwoop.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0D8F43D41 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 22:18:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from [208.206.78.97] (julian.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.97]) by mail.vicor-nb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC9487A403; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 14:18:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <42360DB2.5000500@elischer.org> Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 14:18:26 -0800 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050218 X-Accept-Language: en, hu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff References: <4235E6CC.7040909@santaba.com> In-Reply-To: <4235E6CC.7040909@santaba.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPMI doesn't work... X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 22:18:28 -0000 I use IPMI with intel boards using the fxp driver. it seems to work ok.. The only problem I have seen its that is IS possible for the OS to turn off the NIC so that IPMI can't be reached.. Usually during a 'suspend' or similar. On a server you wouldn't do that however. Jeff wrote: > worth posting to -net> > > on a 5.3 amd64 system. anyone have any luck or know anything about > this? i can query variables right up until the point where the kernel > loads, then nothing. ibm is saying this can be caused by the actual > nic driver (the Baseboard Management Controller (BMC) shares the > network interface); the system uses a Broadcom BCM5704C Dual gig adapter: > > bge0: mem > 0xfe000000-0xfe00ffff,0xfe010000-0xfe01ffff irq 24 at device 1.0 on pci2 > > anyone have any idea why this may be the case? unfortunately for me > and others here, the inability to remotely manage boxes (console/power > cycle/detect drive failures/etc) via ipmi will be a deal breaker in > our push for FBSD in our fleet (couple hundred) of dual proc amd64 IBM > e325 servers. SuSE here we come (unwillingly)... > > thx > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"