From owner-ctm-users@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Dec  5 15:32:24 2011
Return-Path: <owner-ctm-users@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ctm-users@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BAFE1065676
	for <ctm-users@freebsd.org>; Mon,  5 Dec 2011 15:32:24 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jhs@berklix.com)
Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C05C98FC12
	for <ctm-users@freebsd.org>; Mon,  5 Dec 2011 15:32:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p5DCBCC93.dip.t-dialin.net
	[93.203.204.147]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id pB5FWLZq089233;
	Mon, 5 Dec 2011 15:32:22 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com)
Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41])
	by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pB5FWA4Q018040;
	Mon, 5 Dec 2011 16:32:10 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com)
Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pB5FVvxC038767;
	Mon, 5 Dec 2011 16:32:04 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net)
Message-Id: <201112051532.pB5FVvxC038767@fire.js.berklix.net>
To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu>
From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com>
Organization: http://www.berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany
User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://www.berklix.com/free/
X-URL: http://www.berklix.com
In-reply-to: Your message "Mon, 05 Dec 2011 08:48:13 CST."
	<4EDCD9AD.1000504@missouri.edu> 
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 16:31:57 +0100
Sender: jhs@berklix.com
Cc: "ctm-users@freebsd.org" <ctm-users@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Move ctm to ports? 
X-BeenThere: ctm-users@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CTM User discussions <ctm-users.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/ctm-users>,
	<mailto:ctm-users-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/ctm-users>
List-Post: <mailto:ctm-users@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ctm-users-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/ctm-users>,
	<mailto:ctm-users-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 15:32:24 -0000

Hi,
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> On 12/05/11 08:26, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Roman Kurakin wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> >>> How would people feel about removing ctm and mkctm from the base
> >>> system, and making it into a port?
> 
> OK, I am persuaded - no moving CTM to ports.

Thanks :-)


> I'll see if I can get a 
> src commit bit, with the promise that I will only touch the ctm stuff.

I'm sure you'll have the backing of us ctm-users :-)


> Next - suppose I want to make svn-cur officially part of CTM.  Do any of 
> you see a problem with having something in the base depending upon 
> something in the ports - namely subversion and xz?  (And hopefully in 
> the next few years, subversion will become part of base.)

No problem, XZ moved from ports a while back, it's in src/ 8.2 Release.


> Similarly, if you try to apply the svn deltas, you will get an error like
> 
> "You need to install subversion from the port devel/subversion."
> 
> So the errors would be run time, not compile time.

Sounds good.

Cheers,
Julian
-- 
Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com
 Reply below not above, cumulative like a play script, & indent with "> ".
 Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable.