Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 17:55:25 -0400 From: Steve Wills <swills@FreeBSD.org> To: marino@freebsd.org, Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>, Adam Weinberger <adamw@anoxia.adamw.org>, Antoine Brodin <antoine@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r422160 - in head: chinese/fortune french/fortune-mod-zarathoustra misc/fortune-mod-bible misc/fortune-mod-bofh misc/fortune-mod-culmea-culmilor misc/fortune-mod-epictetus misc/fortune-... Message-ID: <087264b0-36ab-e844-f2f9-8389566dd654@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <9d118285-dd65-0b88-59cd-c8130d4d4f6f@marino.st> References: <201609141950.u8EJolO7085386@repo.freebsd.org> <857FD0DF-6ADA-48F5-B02B-81BCA7135E2C@adamw.org> <03e06c33-6185-334f-bf04-71321aaf2cb7@FreeBSD.org> <9ffe58d7-66b0-b357-1777-6e4d3d4f5297@marino.st> <fea8b56c-6aa1-2ec9-f66f-e17a8a912e0a@FreeBSD.org> <9d118285-dd65-0b88-59cd-c8130d4d4f6f@marino.st>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 09/14/2016 17:28, John Marino wrote: > The fact is that the scenario above is legitimate and it was fixed. I'm not sure I agree. There are exceptions, but ports hasn't typically accommodated all the things that can be disabled in base. Looks like there are 179 WITHOUT_* knobs. I'm probably missing something, but it looks like ports only currently accommodates WITHOUT_NLS and WITHOUT_SSP. Not all of the WITHOUT_* knobs would affect ports, but adding support for all the WITHOUT_* knobs would still be a big decision and a big job. Adding support for WITHOUT_GAMES would have been different from what was done. Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?087264b0-36ab-e844-f2f9-8389566dd654>