From owner-freebsd-security  Wed Sep  6 13:21:32 1995
Return-Path: security-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id NAA19638
          for security-outgoing; Wed, 6 Sep 1995 13:21:32 -0700
Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.17])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id NAA19619
          for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Wed, 6 Sep 1995 13:21:28 -0700
Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin [198.145.90.34]) by Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id NAA13308; Wed, 6 Sep 1995 13:20:19 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.11/8.6.5) with SMTP id NAA26565; Wed, 6 Sep 1995 13:22:16 -0700
Message-Id: <199509062022.NAA26565@corbin.Root.COM>
To: Tom Samplonius <tom@uniserve.com>
cc: Bill Trost <trost@cloud.rain.com>, Brian Tao <taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw>,
        freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Do we *really* need logger(1)? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 06 Sep 95 12:56:23 PDT."
             <Pine.BSF.3.91.950906125555.7950A-100000@haven.uniserve.com> 
From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM>
Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 1995 13:22:14 -0700
Sender: security-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

>On Wed, 6 Sep 1995, Bill Trost wrote:
>
>> Internet, so syslogd(8) can also be used as a remote disk-filling
>> service.  (And, since it's UDP-based, you can't tcp-wrap it...).
>
>  tcp_wrapper is primitive.  xinetd is better and can support UDP.

   Um, syslogd is a daemon and is not spawned by inetd...so how would doing
anything with inetd affect this problem?

-DG