Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 11:41:47 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org, ru@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/33852: docs/33852: split(1) man page implies that input file is removed. Message-ID: <20060516114147.112c0f7b.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200605161510.k4GFAQfj000470@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200605161510.k4GFAQfj000470@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 16 May 2006 15:10:26 GMT Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> wrote: > The following reply was made to PR docs/33852; it has been noted by GNATS. > > From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> > To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> > Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: docs/33852: docs/33852: split(1) man page implies that input file is removed. > Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 18:05:33 +0300 > > Hi Ruslan, > Any change we can commit the last patch of this PR? > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=docs/33852 > > IMHO, it looks ok, but I don't think we can expect Gary to review > it any time soon now... I've CC:ed brother Ruslan. Personally, I think the patch is fine other than the odd change to usage(). Otherwise, it looks fine. And I believe Ruslan only worried about keeping everything in sync. -- Tom Rhodes
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060516114147.112c0f7b.trhodes>