Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 14:56:31 +0800 From: leafy <leafy@leafy.idv.tw> To: Hermes Trismegistus <hermes@trismegistus.net> Cc: Michael Edenfield <kutulu@kutulu.org> Subject: Re: The ongoing saga of lsof-4.71.1 Message-ID: <20040428065631.GA19011@chihiro.leafy.idv.tw> In-Reply-To: <20040428013306.K59649@sherman.trismegistus.net> References: <20040426221217.GA40770@wombat.localnet> <20040428043909.GA18110@chihiro.leafy.idv.tw> <20040428013306.K59649@sherman.trismegistus.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 01:36:49AM -0500, Hermes Trismegistus wrote:
> FreeBSD sherman.trismegistus.net 5.2-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT #2: Wed
> Mar 17 22:57:36 CST 2004
> root@sherman.trismegistus.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SHERMAN i386
>
> Maybe time to do a "make buildworld", you think? Anyway, thanks for the
> insight. Anyway you cut it, the newest version of lsof is "broke" for me
> (and Mike).
>
> Cheers,
>
Mine goes like
FreeBSD chihiro.leafy.idv.tw 5.2-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT #31: Wed
Apr 28 11:01:16 CST 2004
But as Mike put it, it may just be lsof assuming that all version>=5.2
has the definition when it actually does not. I'd suggest you file a pr
agains lsof port though, just in case.
Cheers,
Jiawei
--
"Without the userland, the kernel is useless."
--inspired by The Tao of Programming
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040428065631.GA19011>