Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2007 11:18:37 +0100 From: bram <bram@diomedia.be> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linux "equivalent" to freebsd Message-ID: <45E94B7D.6000902@diomedia.be> In-Reply-To: <200703030152.27232.danny@ricin.com> References: <003d01c75b92$a3ae4b10$eb0ae130$@ca> <200703030152.27232.danny@ricin.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi I'm not really pro-linux and I really like freebsd but if have to use linux (because I need things not available on bsd). I always use fedora, it's fast to install lot's of info on the net and it is not time consuming (1 hour to install). Danny Pansters schreef: > If you have a (Free)BSD mindset and like your rc.conf but don't mind > typing "pacman" instead of pkg_* or portupgrade -P * and you don't mind using > something called ABS for src packages, which is like ports, only with a stage > install before live-system install, then you may just like ArchLinux. > > I tried many but besides Debian, Arch is the only one I really enjoyed toying > with. Haven't used Arch on serious production system, but it appears that > other people do. Gentoo is nice (and keeps you busy/entertained) until it > blows up on you. > > Just my 0.02 as a long time FreeBSD user. The linux I used most was Debian but > that was long ago before I landed at BSD. > > Dan > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45E94B7D.6000902>