From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Mar 15 5: 6:38 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from axl.ops.uunet.co.za (axl.ops.uunet.co.za [196.31.1.175]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1CE537B91D for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 05:06:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sheldonh@axl.ops.uunet.co.za) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.ops.uunet.co.za) by axl.ops.uunet.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1) id 12VDVA-000Dl7-00; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 15:06:16 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: Arnout Boer Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why not gzip iso images? In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 15 Mar 2000 13:42:11 +0100." <20000315134211.A47945@tomcat.xs4all.nl> Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 15:06:16 +0200 Message-ID: <52892.953125576@axl.ops.uunet.co.za> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 15 Mar 2000 13:42:11 +0100, Arnout Boer wrote: > But for the ISO images... IS it a problem to gzip > them.... Well, I can think of at least one problem. Think of the extra disk space folks would need for the gunzip step. :-) > They take less space on the master site and the mirror > sites and they take less bandwidth! I'm pretty sure that the folks most affected by this sort of thing benefit from PPP / hardware compression anyway. Ciao Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message