From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 18 12:22:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9EF8106567D for ; Sun, 18 Jul 2010 12:22:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de [217.11.53.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 648518FC1C for ; Sun, 18 Jul 2010 12:22:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (pD9E2F0A8.dip.t-dialin.net [217.226.240.168]) by mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 92E6784405D; Sun, 18 Jul 2010 14:22:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from unknown (unknown [192.168.2.110]) by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 293A8159C; Sun, 18 Jul 2010 14:22:24 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 14:22:21 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100718142221.00007932@unknown> In-Reply-To: <20100717105134.GB13626@lordsith.net> References: <4C3C7202.7090103@FreeBSD.org> <20100717101459.GA13626@lordsith.net> <9E4FCF4C-7A69-426E-9F39-B5487D4CB07C@lassitu.de> <20100717105134.GB13626@lordsith.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2cvs15 (GTK+ 2.16.0; i586-pc-mingw32msvc) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EBL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-EBL-MailScanner-ID: 92E6784405D.A628C X-EBL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-EBL-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, spamhaus-ZEN, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-0.846, required 6, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00, TW_YF 0.08, TW_ZF 0.08) X-EBL-MailScanner-From: alexander@leidinger.net X-EBL-MailScanner-Watermark: 1280060549.43732@JUzdzfdPESyM7pFXQCazXg X-EBL-Spam-Status: No Cc: Marco van Lienen Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] ZFS version 15 committed to head X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 12:22:32 -0000 On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 12:51:34 +0200 Marco van Lienen wrote: > On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 12:25:56PM +0200, you (Stefan Bethke) sent > the following to the -current list: > > Am 17.07.2010 um 12:14 schrieb Marco van Lienen: > > > > > # zpool list pool1 > > > NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT > > > pool1 5.44T 147K 5.44T 0% ONLINE - > > ... > > > zfs list however only shows: > > > # zfs list pool1 > > > NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT > > > pool1 91.9K 3.56T 28.0K /pool1 > > > > > > I just lost the space of an entire hdd! > > > > zpool always shows the raw capacity (without redundancy), zfs the > > actual available capacity. > > I have read many things about those differences, but why then does > zfs on opensolaris report more available space whereas FreeBSD does > not? That would imply that my friend running osol build 117 couldn't > fill up his raidz pool past the 3.56T. If you compare the yfs list output of OSol and FreeBSD and they differ where they shouldn't, you should have a look if compression and/or deduplication (were available) is activated. Bye, Alexander.