Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 09:32:12 -0400 From: Paul Kraus <paul@kraus-haus.org> To: CyberLeo Kitsana <cyberleo@cyberleo.net> Cc: Scott Bennett <bennett@sdf.org>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, kpneal@pobox.com Subject: Re: some ZFS questions Message-ID: <653E16C8-1CE7-4DE9-AE53-A93D871E37DF@kraus-haus.org> In-Reply-To: <53FB0AFD.6010507@cyberleo.net> References: <201408070816.s778G9ug015988@sdf.org> <40AF5B49-80AF-4FE2-BA14-BFF86164EAA8@kraus-haus.org> <201408211007.s7LA7YGd002430@sdf.org> <20140822005911.GA52625@neutralgood.org> <201408241027.s7OARfEK004658@sdf.org> <53FB0AFD.6010507@cyberleo.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
A business not technical question below =85 On Aug 25, 2014, at 6:07, CyberLeo Kitsana <cyberleo@cyberleo.net> = wrote: > I'm currently running a 30TB=86 10-disk zpool on a machine with a = Haswell > CPU and, with AES-NI, the encryption operation is faster than the > throughput of all disks combined; there is no perceptible performance > impact. When a disk failed recently, it was so much easier to simply > destroy the key material rather than having to worry about somehow > securely erasing a device that was not always responsive before = shipping > it back for replacement. >=20 > I have a lot of failed hard drives. Is it really cheaper to RMA a failed drive that just toss it ? If you have =93a lot=94 of failed drives, have thou found the root cause = yet? Do share. -- Paul Kraus paul@kraus-haus.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?653E16C8-1CE7-4DE9-AE53-A93D871E37DF>