From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Apr 1 18:15:00 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE9055B233F for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 18:15:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Received: from mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [65.121.55.42]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FBBDN08Vvz4cxg for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 18:14:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Deprecation of portsnap (was: Proposed ports git transition schedule) From: "@lbutlr" In-Reply-To: <20210401101908.vrdkx4kphfjm2dau@nexus.home.palmen-it.de> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 12:14:57 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20210326092245.0689a732@raksha.tavi.co.uk> <20210326130417.agarfdiuttp5l3vw@nexus.home.palmen-it.de> <20210326142711.4cf61b0e@raksha.tavi.co.uk> <20210326183003.uegcte2aqi7fawuy@nexus.home.palmen-it.de> <20210401101908.vrdkx4kphfjm2dau@nexus.home.palmen-it.de> To: FreeBSD X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.80.0.2.43) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FBBDN08Vvz4cxg X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kremels@kreme.com designates 65.121.55.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kremels@kreme.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.40 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[65.121.55.42:from]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MISSING_MIME_VERSION(2.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[kreme.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[65.121.55.42:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.999]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:209, ipnet:65.112.0.0/12, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[65.121.55.42:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 18:15:00 -0000 On 01 Apr 2021, at 04:19, Felix Palmen wrote: > * Christoph Moench-Tegeder [20210326 19:45]: >> ## Felix Palmen (felix@palmen-it.de): >>> I'd assume (someone may correct me) that portsnap will still be >>> supported, >> = https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2020-August/119098.html > Is this finally decided, and is there a timeline? That post I read as the official decision that port snap was going to = die. But WITHOUT_PORTSANP added to the default base would be the = single, I'd think. Most of the ground work has already been done. > portsnap is still built by default on releng/13.0. We'll see if it makes it to RELEASE or not. gitup is working well right now, but it looks more fiddly and I wish the = 'fake JSON' configuration file was actual valid JSON, OTOH, it seems o = run a lot faster than portsnap. --=20 I WILL NOT TRADE PANTS WITH OTHERS Bart chalkboard Ep. 7F05