From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 26 15:44:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB64E106566C for ; Tue, 26 May 2009 15:44:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from francisco.cabrita@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f213.google.com (mail-bw0-f213.google.com [209.85.218.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2FF28FC0A for ; Tue, 26 May 2009 15:44:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from francisco.cabrita@gmail.com) Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so3991918bwz.43 for ; Tue, 26 May 2009 08:44:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=rCicnXsmmRoF+6ZyKeraA87ROmhhmI4afvvvdkJ+vz8=; b=vrUOWDmoOSlAb6dP9GOcypQfYAOmunBchSAX0nUa3hqepk5EO+WHAYGybji2RVAhDx ibl0r47fQ62I7Na5bhZVDyx+U9964aCTZ7OaAyLEEQk3EDRo/lBtf//Rr3XTxknFgwk3 fT8S7b0iFwfteUKjcU7hqOfBZeJAe2tf9+OJg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=QBBVkKRqEPBFx/ok9HnjygU4ErAmxHRelHFzE+1ylSxq7IKcI95u+NSqfQM0lJjWEx VIS3BCBJbvTFMj10jsPYOy2+YAmNpR1XsZQSXNJVViZdjc0/tAsV15kvJqeElMb4igRS /11ZvkfnbIQvnz8zVxdbTC365E9gSi+xKXANQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.51.130 with SMTP id d2mr8323263bkg.12.1243352640755; Tue, 26 May 2009 08:44:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <200905251056.09987.lists@jnielsen.net> Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 16:44:00 +0100 Message-ID: From: Francisco Cabrita To: Ivan Voras Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question about iSCSI X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 15:44:03 -0000 Hi Ivan, On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Ivan Voras wrote: > Francisco Cabrita wrote: > > > Avoiding iSCSI it's a nice possibility but, on this new scenario the > volumes > > are exported to both w2k PDC and w2k BDC. My client relies upon a very > > granular permission scheme. I don't know if I can handle this without a > NTFS > > volume. (If I'm not wrong, we can't format a NTFS partition under > FreeBSD) > > No, and it wouldn't be of any use to you since Samba would still see it > as a POSIX file system. > > > OTOH, Samba has some rudimentary support for ACLs (it's a built-time > option) and UFS2 has ACL support by default, though it needs to be > enabled in fstab (see mount(8)), so depending on how convoluted are your > requirements, it might or might not work. > > See for example: http://aisalen.wordpress.com/2007/08/10/acls-on-samba/ > Oh great! This sounds very very good and simple too! Resume 1) we have "options UFS_ACL" in our generic; so I can use UFS2 to host user data; 2) Build Samba 3 with "ACL_SUPPORT=3Dyes"; 3) Add acls flag to fstab. Et voi l=E1. Tests, lots of tests. You guys really opened my mind! I don't know yet if I'm gonna use this way on this particular project, but is very nice to know this stuff. Once again, Many thanks :) Best Regards, Francisco Cabrita --=20 blog: http://sufixo.com/raw http://www.linkedin.com/in/franciscocabrita