From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 03:03:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8505C16A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 03:03:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eol1@yahoo.com) Received: from web51915.mail.yahoo.com (web51915.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.48.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 62AF543D5D for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 03:03:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eol1@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 14018 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Feb 2006 03:03:09 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=FevVaAohuedybxwKhL0cZylZzuZjr0QKeMU+tx7iFDc+JddCV5G5+ZzIWEcFqW6BrZYBOzUWxnUkALn69gH9PBzsWuMgekVHO+dvYUawm7Jgmv8RG/r5STCPpCJr1DaweIzKjmlg5+H3i8DUfvMW1LLF0R7TZQAOxGuPHQj8GHc= ; Message-ID: <20060214030309.14016.qmail@web51915.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [62.68.76.227] by web51915.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:03:09 PST Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:03:09 -0800 (PST) From: Peter Thoenen To: ports@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: devel/ncurses port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: eol1@yahoo.com List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 03:03:12 -0000 Thinking about possibly picking up maintainership on this as two other ports I maintain require it (got me why though, its a legacy run_depends, possible a FBSD 4 holdover?). Not that big a term guy though. Anybody want to fill me in on the differences of lets say ncurse 5.5 and the builtin fbsd 6 ncurses packages? Do we gain anything by replacing the native FBSD term with this one?