From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 13:35:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 516A516A6B4 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 13:35:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@owl.midgard.homeip.net) Received: from pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 751D743D62 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 13:35:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from erikt@owl.midgard.homeip.net) Received: from falcon.midgard.homeip.net (83.253.29.241) by pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (7.2.072.1) id 446337DE000510B3 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:35:40 +0200 Received: (qmail 96920 invoked from network); 12 May 2006 15:35:39 +0200 Received: from owl.midgard.homeip.net (10.1.5.7) by falcon.midgard.homeip.net with SMTP; 12 May 2006 15:35:39 +0200 Received: (qmail 77091 invoked by uid 1001); 12 May 2006 15:35:39 +0200 Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:35:39 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson To: Chris Message-ID: <20060512133539.GA77050@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: Chris , Kris Kennaway , Kouji Ito , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4462FA0B.2090100@cty-net.ne.jp> <20060511150818.GB69548@xor.obsecurity.org> <8a0028260605110826h13211353rbe374ccc5f5e7ce4@mail.gmail.com> <20060511175135.GA71742@xor.obsecurity.org> <3aaaa3a0605120556g78e88afn290f25de3ff129eb@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3aaaa3a0605120556g78e88afn290f25de3ff129eb@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: Kouji Ito , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: when 5.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:35:47 -0000 On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 01:56:43PM +0100, Chris wrote: > On 11/05/06, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:26:04PM +0100, Jeff Rollin wrote: > >> Are maintenance releases of old branches always released in step with new > >> ones, or is it just coincidence that it's happening this way this time? > > > >It was deliberate this time to avoid an extra ports freeze cycle, > >since that has very high cost and the benefit is really low since the > >intended audience for 5.5 is small and everyone who can do so will be > >much better off with the enormous benefits of 6. > > > >Kris > > > > > > > > Ahh makes sense to me now, since port freezes are annoying. So there > is no danger of 5.5 been released after 5.4 EOL then? Since the 5.4 EOL date has just been extended by several months I would say that it seems exceedingly unlikely that 5.5 will be released after 5.4 is EOL. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se