From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 21 15:20:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B847E16A4CE for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 15:20:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6573B43D48 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 15:20:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from billf@elvis.mu.org) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1098) id 022CA5C7A0; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 15:20:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 15:20:02 -0700 From: Bill Fumerola To: Borja Marcos Message-ID: <20040421222002.GQ17862@elvis.mu.org> References: <6.0.3.0.0.20040420125557.06b10d48@209.112.4.2> <6.0.3.0.0.20040420144001.0723ab80@209.112.4.2> <200404201332.40827.dr@kyx.net> <20040421111003.GB19640@lum.celabo.org> <6.0.3.0.0.20040421121715.04547510@209.112.4.2> <20040421165454.GB20049@lum.celabo.org> <6.0.3.0.0.20040421132605.0901bb40@209.112.4.2> <48FCF8AA-93CF-11D8-9C50-000393C94468@sarenet.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48FCF8AA-93CF-11D8-9C50-000393C94468@sarenet.es> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.10-MUORG-20040412 i386 X-PGP-Key: 1024D/7F868268 X-PGP-Fingerprint: 5B2D 908E 4C2B F253 DAEB FC01 8436 B70B 7F86 8268 cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Other possible protection against RST/SYN attacks (was Re: TCP RST attack X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 22:20:04 -0000 On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 10:05:49PM +0200, Borja Marcos wrote: > >Are there any "bad things" that can happen by doing this ? > > Well, not every BGP sessions are established between directly > connected interfaces. This would not work with "multi-hop BGP" sessions GTSM works for multihop and this scenario is addressed in RFC3682. -- - bill fumerola / fumerola@yahoo-inc.com / billf@FreeBSD.org