From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 19 20:54:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CF7916A4CE for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 20:54:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dglawrence.com (c-24-21-223-117.client.comcast.net [24.21.223.117]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 585BB43D45 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 20:54:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dg@dglawrence.com) Received: from opteron.dglawrence.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dglawrence.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iAJKsoYc011085; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:54:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dg@dglawrence.com) Received: (from dg@localhost) by opteron.dglawrence.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id iAJKshXD011084; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:54:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dg@dglawrence.com) Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:54:43 -0800 From: "David G. Lawrence" To: "Ernst W. Winter" Message-ID: <20041119205443.GF4339@opteron.dglawrence.com> References: <20041119203821.GE4339@opteron.dglawrence.com> <20041119205422.GA1010@lobo.homeunix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041119205422.GA1010@lobo.homeunix.org> cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nForce 3 150 vs. VIA K8T800 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 20:54:58 -0000 > On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, David G. Lawrence wrote: > > > So, given a choice between an AMD64 motherboard with nVidia nForce > > 3 150 chipset or VIA K8T800 chipset, which one actually works and > > what are the tradeoffs? > > > well I had a Gigabyte G-K8NS with a socket 754 and nForce 3 250 > chipset but switched to a ASUS A8V delux socket 939 with a chipset > VIA K8T800 and the latter is better as well more things seem to work > with less down sides. I think the latter is much better with the > dual channel memory and runs faster. But then again this is only my > recent experience with AMD64. I recall some folks were recently having stability problems with one of the VIA chipsets - any idea which chipset that was? -DG David G. Lawrence President Download Technologies, Inc. - http://www.downloadtech.com - (866) 399 8500 TeraSolutions, Inc. - http://www.terasolutions.com - (888) 346 7175 The FreeBSD Project - http://www.freebsd.org Pave the road of life with opportunities.