Date: Mon, 28 Aug 1995 01:14:22 -0700 From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: jkh@time.cdrom.com Cc: paul@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dependencies Message-ID: <199508280814.BAA03755@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <2283.809597486@time.cdrom.com> (jkh@time.cdrom.com)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* > That is possible, but I thought it would be more robust to use "which" * > because we don't know if the user installed the dependency via pkg_add * > or the ports' "make install". Note that pkg_info looks only at * > /var/db/pkg. * * Shouldn't matter? `make install' now tweaks /var/db/pkg TOO, remember? Sorry, I wasn't clear. I meant, "we don't know it the user installed the dependency (via pkg_add | the ports)". What I wanted to say was, it doesn't work if the user compiled the port and installed it without touching anything in the ports or package area, but that should be fine as far as EXEC_DEPENDS goes. Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199508280814.BAA03755>