From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 4 07:41:55 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F02A437B404 for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 07:41:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.panix.com (mail1.panix.com [166.84.1.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D169743FF3 for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 07:41:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from panix.com (brillig.panix.com [166.84.1.76]) by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A689F4CBF6 for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 10:39:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from teddy.fas.com (pcp01010374pcs.mplsnt01.sc.comcast.net [68.58.176.69]) by panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 754302AA10 for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 10:39:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from stan by teddy.fas.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19YRib-0008E7-00 for ; Fri, 04 Jul 2003 10:39:21 -0400 Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 10:39:20 -0400 From: stan To: Free BSD Questions list Message-ID: <20030704143920.GA31484@teddy.fas.com> Mail-Followup-To: Free BSD Questions list Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Editor: gVim X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-Kernel-Version: 2.4.21 X-Uptime: 10:34:12 up 17 days, 21:36, 3 users, load average: 0.05, 0.13, 0.07 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Stan Brown Subject: Winmodem ltmdm dirver what device to use? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2003 14:41:55 -0000 I've been working on setting up an new laptop as a background task for a couple of months now. All of a sudden today, I find I have to go out of town early in the morning. I've installed FreebSD a couple of times, and once I got the winmodem working using the ports/comm/ltmdm module. I the wiped the disk clean, and started over. I see that I have installed the port again this time, and dmesg looks like it's working. However, I can't for the life of me remember the device to use for this. The machine has one real serial port, so i suspect this should be the 2nd "serial port". If I cu -l cuaa0, I get a connection, but no response to AT commands. If I try to cu cuaa1, I get "line bust". Can somebody please re-educate me on this? -- "They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin