From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 2 05:03:52 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B32DC106568F for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2009 05:03:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tajudd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-px0-f190.google.com (mail-px0-f190.google.com [209.85.216.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847CA8FC13 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2009 05:03:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pxi28 with SMTP id 28so2970845pxi.7 for ; Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:03:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=D2oH3Brpy+uiZECIvTWc+dDvsBx/T/kPEsdqO6gSkx4=; b=DrxIGGw47J/igEpie3zyNcHe6Pc4Q6NTLgRDejhG+XoMb8HLzZJMiQXYeLs7cFNdjg nSACd937ns1FaPQo4/FLU3grVZzRA55EwFJaQvO5Lv9JVojrsfINiS0nmTe+ldQnbxZ7 jPw4S/qYvxE1UFKiA4pH97i7XXqUpF1bDbHQM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=e/t3azmJXXcnPh7uUEJX8LUtOdz4DnUsS02k1fZiFlDH0mSVcFuaYzZDJ+XEtVM4+h 0pl0lmPGQyPwIs8PiO1H3gM4HEw+LYBb8KNj/DzuD1R0urKYVP1J9hGfqzb1dUGJ/SpG 1ZoXtmUO9JDC1o8Kzm78LxNPXS+jH2L+jxt98= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.115.116.5 with SMTP id t5mr7091393wam.185.1257138232153; Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:03:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <479349.15334.qm@web30804.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <82804.79685.qm@web30804.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <516971.12872.qm@web30807.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <806321.83601.qm@web30807.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <49594.91061.qm@web30806.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <479349.15334.qm@web30804.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 22:03:51 -0700 Message-ID: From: Tim Judd To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E1nielisz_L=E1szl=F3?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dhcpd related issue - not giving up X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 05:03:52 -0000 On 11/1/09, D=E1nielisz L=E1szl=F3 wrote: > It's the only one on the network. Doesn't mean that it will answer. I saw your previous posts which has the authoritative declaration. Authoritative (from my experience) means that if a client had previously gotten an address, a non-authoritative server won't correct the client's lease. Think of a roaming laptop or a PDA with wifi. An authoritative server will say "No, that won't work", then the client will release any knowledge of the previous IP, and search for new dhcp servers. Since you weren't getting leases when your firewall was disabled, I would lean toward a misconfigured dhcpd.conf. I don't think I've seen in the same post: ifconfig rl1 cat /usr/local/etc/dhcpd.conf Please provide these. Thanks. > ________________________________ > From: Tim Judd > To: D=E1nielisz L=E1szl=F3 > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Sent: Sun, November 1, 2009 5:41:58 PM > Subject: Re: dhcpd related issue - not giving up > > > > is your dhcpd authoritative? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > > > >