From owner-freebsd-security Mon Apr 15 8:21:37 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from axl.seasidesoftware.co.za (axl.seasidesoftware.co.za [196.31.7.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E1B437B404 for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 08:21:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.seasidesoftware.co.za) by axl.seasidesoftware.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16x8LL-0003iD-00; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 17:24:35 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: The Anarcat Cc: Andrew Johns , Christoph Kukulies , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: General Rate-limiting in syslog(3) (was: Limiting closed port RST response from 381 to 200 p) In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 15 Apr 2002 11:14:22 -0400." <20020415151422.GA302@lenny.anarcat.dyndns.org> Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 17:24:35 +0200 Message-ID: <14272.1018884275@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 15 Apr 2002 11:14:22 -0400, The Anarcat wrote: > Actually, what I would like would be a generic rate-limiting facility > in syslog(3) itself. That would make DOS much harder. There already is; that's what my patch relies on. It's just that syslog's rate-limiting relies on messages being identical. Anything more complicated is probably going to involve a new API, which is probably more than what's required here. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message