Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:26:02 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> To: Valentin Nechayev <netch@lucky.net> Cc: ports-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gcc34 isn't buildable on 4.10 Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.58.0407161423100.82896@spica.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> In-Reply-To: <20040716094033.GI1085@lucky.net> References: <20040716094033.GI1085@lucky.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Valentin Nechayev wrote: > does anybody see this? > > /usr/ports/lang/gcc34/work/build/gcc/xgcc -B/usr/ports/lang/gcc34/work/build/gcc > / -B/usr/local/gcc34/i386-portbld-freebsd4.10/bin/ -B/usr/local/gcc34/i386-portb > ld-freebsd4.10/lib/ -isystem /usr/local/gcc34/i386-portbld-freebsd4.10/include - > isystem /usr/local/gcc34/i386-portbld-freebsd4.10/sys-include -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H > -O2 -O -pipe -march=i586 -mcpu=i686 -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -I. -I../.././ > ..//gcc-3.4-20040709/libiberty/../include -W -Wall -Wtraditional -pedantic ../. > ././..//gcc-3.4-20040709/libiberty/fibheap.c -o fibheap.o > `-mcpu=' is deprecated. Use `-mtune=' or '-march=' instead. > ../.././..//gcc-3.4-20040709/libiberty/fibheap.c: In function `fibheap_union': > ../.././..//gcc-3.4-20040709/libiberty/fibheap.c:166: warning: implicit declarat > ion of function `free' > ../.././..//gcc-3.4-20040709/libiberty/fibheap.c: In function `fibheap_delete_no > de': > ../.././..//gcc-3.4-20040709/libiberty/fibheap.c:285: error: `LONG_MIN' undeclar > ed (first use in this function) > ../.././..//gcc-3.4-20040709/libiberty/fibheap.c:285: error: (Each undeclared id > entifier is reported only once > ../.././..//gcc-3.4-20040709/libiberty/fibheap.c:285: error: for each function i > t appears in.) > ../.././..//gcc-3.4-20040709/libiberty/fibheap.c: In function `fibheap_consolida > te': > ../.././..//gcc-3.4-20040709/libiberty/fibheap.c:395: warning: implicit declarat > ion of function `memset' > gmake[2]: *** [fibheap.o] Error 1 I don't see this, but my 4.x tester is running 4.9-RELEASE-p5 right now; I do have some doubts that this should be due to the difference from 4.9 to 4.10, though. It seems you have some additional options set? Gerald -- Gerald Pfeifer (Jerry) gerald@pfeifer.com http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.58.0407161423100.82896>