From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan  4 17:57:25 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: doc@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C5A3106564A;
	Sun,  4 Jan 2009 17:57:25 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from danger@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from services.rulez.sk (services.rulez.sk [92.240.234.125])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D179B8FC08;
	Sun,  4 Jan 2009 17:57:24 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from danger@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from localhost (services.rulez.sk [92.240.234.125])
	by services.rulez.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1800E13344B5;
	Sun,  4 Jan 2009 18:57:24 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rulez.sk
Received: from services.rulez.sk ([92.240.234.125])
	by localhost (services.rulez.sk [92.240.234.125]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024)
	with ESMTP id iFmKdtc4Jfhf; Sun,  4 Jan 2009 18:57:23 +0100 (CET)
Received: from DANGER-PC (danger.mcrn.sk [84.16.37.254])
	(Authenticated sender: danger@rulez.sk)
	by services.rulez.sk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 50809133445A;
	Sun,  4 Jan 2009 18:57:23 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:57:21 +0100
From: Daniel Gerzo <danger@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: The FreeBSD Project
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <1289663263.20090104185721@rulez.sk>
To: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090105.025058.119952164.hrs@allbsd.org>
References: <200901041541.n04Ff1Oh060753@svn.freebsd.org>
	<20090104155832.GA1257@haakonia.hitnet.RWTH-Aachen.DE>
	<287359450.20090104174842@rulez.sk>
	<20090105.025058.119952164.hrs@allbsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1250
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: danger@FreeBSD.org, doc@FreeBSD.org, brueffer@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re[2]: svn commit: r186737 - head/sbin/geom/class/virstor
X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Documentation project <freebsd-doc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:57:25 -0000

Hello Hiroki,

Sunday, January 4, 2009, 6:50:58 PM, you wrote:

> Daniel Gerzo <danger@freebsd.org> wrote
>   in <287359450.20090104174842@rulez.sk>:

da>> Hello Christian,
da>>
da>> Sunday, January 4, 2009, 4:58:32 PM, you wrote:
da>>
da>> > While using .Ex is good, collapsing EXIT STATUS into DIAGNOSTICS is =
not.
da>> > EXIT STATUS is a standard section in our manpages and it's orthogona=
l to
da>> > DIAGNOSTICS.
da>>
da>> I am fine to revert this part, however I have trimmed this section
da>> just because I didn't see it listed in the PAGE STRUCTURE DOMAIN
da>> section of the mdoc(7) manual page.
da>>
da>> Interestingly, it lists the DIAGNOSTICS section and explicitly
da>> says that .Ex macro should be used there.

>  Is using .Ex macro really correct?.  When geom(1) fails the exit
>  status will be 1, not >0.  While many commands whose manual page says
>  so return 1 on an error actually (especially when it is in POSIX),
>  the two are not the same at least.

I thought that 1 > 0 ... (?)

--=20
Best regards,
 Daniel                            mailto:danger@FreeBSD.org