From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat May 31 13:50:04 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CB8E106573A
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 31 May 2008 13:50:04 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C7B48FC13
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 31 May 2008 13:50:04 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m4VDo48A006624
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 31 May 2008 13:50:04 GMT
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id m4VDo4rk006623;
	Sat, 31 May 2008 13:50:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats)
Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 13:50:04 GMT
Message-Id: <200805311350.m4VDo4rk006623@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
From: Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu>
Cc: 
Subject: Re: ports/124122: [PATCH] security/barnyard: [SUMMARIZE CHANGES]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu>
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 13:50:04 -0000

The following reply was made to PR ports/124122; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu>
To: Akiko Narita <shuyaan@gmail.com>, bug-followup@freebsd.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: ports/124122: [PATCH] security/barnyard: [SUMMARIZE CHANGES]
Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 08:43:27 -0500

 --On May 31, 2008 9:35:31 PM +0900 Akiko Narita <shuyaan@gmail.com> wrote:
 
 >> I don't know what the desire is for the submission of this patch, but
 >> barnyard won't even run without the correct flags, so the patch doesn't
 >> make any sense to me.
 >
 > Hello Paul,
 >
 > Sorry, I forgot to describe the problem I'm trying to solve.
 >
 > I've used barnyard-sguil-0.2.0_4.
 > When I started up barnyard-sguil, barnyard loaded 'barnyard_flags'
 > redundantly(/usr/local/etc/rc.d/barnyard and /etc/rc.conf) and it
 > couldn't start up.
 > I think that you don't need to specify 'barnyard_flags' in
 > rc.d/barnyard. '*_flags' is usually set in /etc/rc.conf, isn't it?
 >
 
 Barnyard_flags must be defined in the startup script or its values in 
 rc.conf will be ignored.  However, I may have made a mistake in the 
 startup file that is causing the inclusion of both.  I'll investigate.
 
 Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu)
 Senior Information Security Analyst
 The University of Texas at Dallas
 http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/