From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 10 17:34:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 479EE2B4; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 17:34:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from apnoea.adamw.org (apnoea.adamw.org [204.109.59.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EDB8306; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 17:34:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.192.25] (dhcp-108-170-169-12.cable.user.start.ca [108.170.169.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by apnoea.adamw.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 16733114986; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 13:33:58 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: svn commit: r367789 - in head: . dns dns/posadis games games/linux-savage net net/etherboot From: Adam Weinberger In-Reply-To: <540FE9F2.2040501@marino.st> Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 13:33:57 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <7BE81AFC-E22A-4E39-8FC7-FF6E534447BC@adamw.org> References: <201409092248.s89MmeZq039294@svn.freebsd.org> <34104EFD-4F9E-4383-9D3B-6150EE77DE65@adamw.org> <540FE91A.2070905@marino.st> <540FE9F2.2040501@marino.st> To: marino@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 17:34:01 -0000 On 10 Sep, 2014, at 2:04, John Marino wrote: > On 9/10/2014 08:00, John Marino wrote: >> On 9/10/2014 06:14, Adam Weinberger wrote: >>> If those problems haven=92t been fixed, is it worth deprecating = poslib too? >>>=20 >>=20 >> posadis has essentially been abandoned for 10 years. The last = activity >> on the SF source was about 6 weeks after the last release. There are >> other dns implementations that are still maintained, so yes, I think >> poslib should be deprecated. I didn't know it existed. >>=20 >=20 > On the other hand, it builds and it's not hurting anything and it = looks > like it can be used in external standalone applications, so I wouldn't > object to just leaving it either. You=92re right about everything you said there. I was just concerned = that the posadis failures may have been indicators that there were = fundamental problems with *using* the poslib library on modern = compilers. # Adam --=20 Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org http://www.adamw.org