From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Sep 24 22:56:53 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from peter3.wemm.org (c1315225-a.plstn1.sfba.home.com [24.14.150.180]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 109EE37B41D for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 22:56:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from overcee.netplex.com.au (overcee.wemm.org [10.0.0.3]) by peter3.wemm.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f8P5ueM20772 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 22:56:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: from wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by overcee.netplex.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9472C3808; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 22:56:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Matt Dillon Cc: Ian Dowse , Julian Elischer , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Patch to test kstack usage. In-Reply-To: <200109250540.f8P5e6499443@earth.backplane.com> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 22:56:40 -0700 From: Peter Wemm Message-Id: <20010925055640.9472C3808@overcee.netplex.com.au> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Matt Dillon wrote: > Yah... the test I ran was just a couple of seconds worth of playing > around over ssh. I expect the worst case to be a whole lot worse. > > We're going to have to bump up UPAGES to 3 in 4.x, there's no question > about it. I'm going to do it tonight. Heh. I already asked to do it a few weeks ago, in order to get it into the release. I guess I wasn't persistant enough. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; peter@netplex.com.au "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message