From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Feb 28  8:16: 3 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2F9BB37B8C7; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 08:16:01 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu)
Received: (from wollman@localhost)
	by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA52116;
	Mon, 28 Feb 2000 11:15:59 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from wollman)
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 11:15:59 -0500 (EST)
From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Message-Id: <200002281615.LAA52116@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
To: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: NOCRYPT vs NOSECURE
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0002272302160.95768-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0002272302160.95768-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

<<On Sun, 27 Feb 2000 23:06:25 -0800 (PST), Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.ORG> said:

> Can someone explain to me the point of NOCRYPT?

Historical.  (IIRC it's also tied into the release-building process,
or at least it was.)

-GAWollman

--
Garrett A. Wollman   | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same
wollman@lcs.mit.edu  | O Siem / The fires of freedom 
Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame
MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA|                     - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message