From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Dec 22 04:52:39 1994
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id EAA29539 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 22 Dec 1994 04:52:39 -0800
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.34]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA29527 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 22 Dec 1994 12:52:23 GMT
Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.6.9/8.6.9) id XAA04385; Thu, 22 Dec 1994 23:47:13 +1100
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 1994 23:47:13 +1100
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199412221247.XAA04385@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: bde@zeta.org.au, jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com
Subject: Re: bidirectional ports ?
Cc: burg@burg.is.ge.com, hackers@freebsd.org
Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

>> Another bug: if I run cu while rlogin'ed, it connects correctly, but
>> when I type "~.", both cu and rlogin exit.

>Er, am I missing something?  This sounds right.  If you are rlogin'd, you
>have one layer of tilde-controls.  If you rlogin and then cu, the cu is a
>second layer of tilde-control.  If you want to quote a tilde, send "~~".  So
>if one were rlogin'd twice, and wanted to exit cu, one would do "~~~~."

I always used ^D to exit from rlogin and didn't know that ~. exited from
it.

Bruce