Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 07 Dec 2018 19:21:37 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        fs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 233849] [PATCH] r339008 broke repquota on UFS
Message-ID:  <bug-233849-3630-I1v5h8ZVTS@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-233849-3630@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-233849-3630@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D233849

--- Comment #3 from Sean Eric Fagan <sef@FreeBSD.org> ---
ok.  repquota is going through and reading the quoata file.  Which it can o=
nly
do on UFS.

There is, as far as I can tell, no problem with checking hasquota() first,
although if it returns no error, then there's no reason to call quotactl()
afterwards, I think.

This means the code should be moved around and refactored a bit to get the
tests done in the right way -- namely, only call quotactl() if hasquota()
fails, but fail if quotactl() fails, but also if hasquota() succeeds but it=
's
not UFS. (For now, anyway.)

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-233849-3630-I1v5h8ZVTS>