Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 16 Jan 2001 14:01:41 -0800
From:      Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org>
To:        Brian Dean <bsd@bsdhome.com>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: NFS_ROOT not working when using a Netapp server 
Message-ID:  <200101162201.f0GM1fl02021@mass.osd.bsdi.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 16 Jan 2001 16:17:35 EST." <20010116161735.A34527@vger.bsdhome.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> However, this was done with an NFS V3 mount and as you observed,
> FreeBSD uses NFSv2 for the root.  After repeating this same same
> procedure using an NVSv2 mount to the Netapp, the major/minor numbers
> look a whole lot better and it now works just fine.
> 
> It's odd, though, that the NFSv2 and NFSv3 handle these aspects of of
> the inode so differently.  I wonder if this is a bug, and if so, is it
> Netapp's or ours?  It is interesting to note that this mangling does
> not occur when FreeBSD is both the client and the server.

It's a "feature" of the way that the NetApp box stores the major/minor 
numbers, and not really a bug per se.  FreeBSD has somewhat different 
expectations of major/minor number storage as compared to some other 
platforms, and the interactions are not well defined.

-- 
... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his
rivals and unfortunately opponents also.  But not because people want
to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force
people to take different points of view.  [Dr. Fritz Todt]
           V I C T O R Y   N O T   V E N G E A N C E




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200101162201.f0GM1fl02021>