From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 26 13:38:30 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 092E416A4CE for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:38:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.chrononomicon.com (chrononomicon.com [216.37.143.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA1EC43D62 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:38:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsilver@chrononomicon.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [192.168.0.42]) by mail.chrononomicon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A1DA31F709; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 08:40:23 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <002c01c5038a$b9e28ed0$0201a8c0@SPECULUSHX1THE> References: <002c01c5038a$b9e28ed0$0201a8c0@SPECULUSHX1THE> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <8F131149-6F9F-11D9-A3AB-000D9338770A@chrononomicon.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bart Silverstrim Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 08:38:27 -0500 To: "cali" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: portmanager loop? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:38:30 -0000 On Jan 26, 2005, at 4:38 AM, cali wrote: >> I had (have?) several packages in the ports collection that needed >> updating, and recently someone in the list was talking about using >> portmanager -u to save on problems with updating; it doesn't touch >> the ports database, it won't mess up the collection, it walks >> dependencies automagically, etc...should be as easy as "portmanager >> -u" and letting it do it's magic, correct? > > I read the same thing, and thought I'd give it a shot. > >> On the Dell 2650 this is running on (FBSD 4.9) *seems* to keep >> recompiling xfree86-4-server. Is there a way to tell if it is stuck >> in a loop? I had to stop it yesterday after it had been upgrading >> for several hours. > > The same thing happened to me. Not sure where it was stuck but I was > getting a distinct sense of deja-vu watching the output (I don't > really mean deja-vu but I can't think of a better way to say it). I > left it for 30 hours, and then cancelled it. I'm going to try and run > it again today, I'd like to know also if it will eventually get out of > the loop, i.e if it is really a loop or something different. > > sorry that this post doesn't really help the situation Actually the developer for portmanager contacted me about it. He asked for some logfiles, and I didn't think the list wanted a 300k zip file mass mailed so I was privately emailing him about the situation. He's looking into it and hoped to have a fix soon. He's been wonderful with response time to this error and I was glad to help with any logs or testing I could. He had hoped to have a fix in there soon, but I don't know if he found answers yet as to what caused the loop. -Bart