From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 16 16:24:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B7561065672 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:24:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schot@A-Eskwadraat.nl) Received: from a-eskwadraat.nl (square.phys.uu.nl [131.211.39.72]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6DBF8FC19 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:24:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from peter.localdomain ([10.14.0.12] ident=Debian-exim) by a-eskwadraat.nl with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NhQDt-0007pH-42; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:24:29 +0100 Received: from schot by peter.localdomain with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NhQDs-00009F-RX; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:24:28 +0100 Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:24:28 +0100 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100216162428.GA353@A-Eskwadraat.nl> References: <20100216153323.GA28829@A-Eskwadraat.nl> <20100216160240.GA39767@sushi.pseudo.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100216160240.GA39767@sushi.pseudo.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) From: Jeroen Schot Subject: Re: Combining multiple programs in single port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:24:36 -0000 On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 05:02:40PM +0100, Tobias Rehbein wrote: > Am Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 04:33:23PM +0100 schrieb Jeroen Schot: > > I want to provide a port for a set of small utilities[1], all in the same > > scope and from the same upstream, to FreeBSD. Since all are very small > > (around 100 line of C), making seven separate ports seems a bit > > overkill. > > > > What is standard procedure for this? > > Are there any existing ports doing something similar? > > > > [1]: http://tools.suckless.org/ > > Please note that at least dmenu already has it's own port (x11/dmenu). You are correct. I should have mentioned I was looking at the subset lsw, slock, sselp, swarp and wmname. Regards, -- Jeroen Schot