From owner-freebsd-bugs Wed Nov 25 14:10:20 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA16888 for freebsd-bugs-outgoing; Wed, 25 Nov 1998 14:10:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from sam.networx.ie (ts05-085.dublin.indigo.ie [194.125.220.95]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA16872; Wed, 25 Nov 1998 14:10:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@NetworX.ie) Received: from mike (mike.NetworX.ie [194.9.12.33]) by sam.networx.ie (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id SAA00147; Wed, 25 Nov 1998 18:31:52 GMT X-Organisation: I.T. NetworX Ltd X-Business: Network Applications, Consultancy and Training X-Address: Stonebridge House, Shankill, Co. Dublin, Ireland X-Voice: +353-1-28-27-233 X-Fax: +353-1-28-27-230 Date: Wed, 25 Nov 1998 18:37:51 PST From: Michael Ryan Subject: Re: Y2K To: dg@root.com cc: "Jonathan M. Bresler" , Poul-Henning Kamp , wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 25 Nov 1998 04:46:43 -0800 David Greenman wrote: > I think 2.2.5 was released after we made our Y2K compliance statement, > so 2.2.5 would have been thought to be Y2K compliant at the time. > [snip] Thank you sincerely, David. This is what I want: an authoritative opinion as to the status of 2.2.5R. I understand your point about giving guarantees, and I don't want that, just the considered opinion of someone who would know -- a guru like yourself :-) Once again, thanks. Bye, Mike mike@NetworX.ie www.NetworX.ie --- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message