Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:55:22 +0100 From: "Bruce M. Simpson" <bms@FreeBSD.org> To: Giulio Ferro <auryn@zirakzigil.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Eygene Ryabinkin <rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru> Subject: Re: lost routes Message-ID: <48DA54DA.8070102@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <48D8AF8E.6080507@zirakzigil.org> References: <48D8A232.600@zirakzigil.org> <khPlcEAU1du8V9lm5uRMLm0B9tw@/Fp0SwdW81I%2B3GcB7H/3uQSKtB4> <48D8AF8E.6080507@zirakzigil.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Giulio Ferro wrote: > > There are no messages in the logs, and no interface has been > touched. Anyway, since there are a lot of routes and only one > gets deleted I don't think it depends on interface changing > (it would delete them all, wouldn't it?) Normally static routes only get touched if the state of the underlying ifp/ifa changes. There are paths in netinet which will cause routes to be deleted in this situation. Occasionally the idea of a floating static re-surfaces... look in the PR database with this term for possibly related reports. cheers BMS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48DA54DA.8070102>