Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:44:00 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Subject: Should ntpdate REQUIRE named? Message-ID: <43C97EB0.4090306@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Question came up on -stable yesterday about a user who has ntp servers by
hostname in ntp.conf, and because of an unrelated ordering problem ntp[date]
started before named, so they failed. On all the systems I've examined,
named starts right after SERVERS, and ntpdate right after that. While there
are theoretically good reasons why one might want it the other way around, I
think for the vast majority of our users named should start first.
Any comments, objections?
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43C97EB0.4090306>