From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 14 23:40:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FAD8106564A for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 23:40:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corky1951@comcast.net) Received: from QMTA07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.64]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84B3A8FC08 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 23:40:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corky1951@comcast.net) Received: from OMTA16.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.72]) by QMTA07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id FzNH1c0021ZMdJ4A7zg64D; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 23:40:06 +0000 Received: from comcast.net ([98.203.142.76]) by OMTA16.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id FziC1c00T1f6R9u8cziDex; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 23:42:14 +0000 Received: by comcast.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 14 Jul 2009 16:40:03 -0700 Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 16:40:03 -0700 From: Charlie Kester To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090714234003.GB90253@comcast.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <200907141000.n6EA04L9055373@freefall.freebsd.org> <20090714180747.GA90253@comcast.net> <4ad871310907141515g4fade72dq83d60b1835c45f68@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4ad871310907141515g4fade72dq83d60b1835c45f68@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.20 X-Composer: VIM 7.2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: Possibly unbuildable ports reminder X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 23:40:05 -0000 On Tue 14 Jul 2009 at 15:15:25 PDT Glen Barber wrote: > >I swear I asked about this a few weeks ago... > >http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2009-June/055553.html > >The problems I reported then are still present in the latest build >error report. I guess that's why the subject of this thread is *possibly* unbuildable ports. It's kinda frustrating, however, when what I really want is confirmation that my fix worked.