From owner-freebsd-current Tue Dec 19 09:49:22 1995 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id JAA24883 for current-outgoing; Tue, 19 Dec 1995 09:49:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from rocky.sri.MT.net (rocky.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id JAA24876 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 1995 09:49:18 -0800 (PST) Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.sri.MT.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id KAA26843; Tue, 19 Dec 1995 10:45:49 -0700 Date: Tue, 19 Dec 1995 10:45:49 -0700 From: Nate Williams Message-Id: <199512191745.KAA26843@rocky.sri.MT.net> To: Christoph Kukulies Cc: current@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: pcnfsd.. In-Reply-To: <199512191743.SAA19778@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> References: <199512191548.IAA26516@rocky.sri.MT.net> <199512191743.SAA19778@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Christoph Kukulies writes: [ PCNFSD ] > > How useful is it for the general user of FreeBSD? > > > > (I'd say a *very* small percentage of users actually have use for it) > > If you have Macs using NFS for file sharing or if you are using > XFS32 or other Windoze NFC client software.(PC/TCP - ftp software, Inc.). I didn't say it was useless. I said it wasn't useful for the generic user. And, with it so easy to get as a port I don't see why it should become part of the system. I suspect 'fvwm' is more useful to the generic user, but it's not part of the base sources. :) Nate