From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Oct  1 02:29:32 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id CAA01818
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 1 Oct 1997 02:29:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from implode.root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA01811
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 1 Oct 1997 02:29:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by implode.root.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA08397;
	Wed, 1 Oct 1997 02:32:05 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199710010932.CAA08397@implode.root.com>
To: Richard Jones <richard@a42.deep-thought.org>
cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: FreeBSD TCP stack SUX big juicy ones. 
From: David Greenman <dg@root.com>
Reply-To: dg@root.com
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 1997 02:32:05 -0700
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

   I said:

>problem you've reported. Your report lacks many important details, not
>the least of which is the versions of FreeBSD you've tested this with.
>"freefall" is running old code from about 4 months ago, and might very well
>not have some important fixes.

   Oh, and it's even worse than that - 204.216.27.18 in your example is
hub.freebsd.org, not freefall, and hub is running FreeBSD 2.1.7 which is
a code base that is several years old.

-DG

David Greenman
Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project