From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Nov 22 18:43:50 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E22106564A
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:43:50 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com)
Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com
	[64.81.227.250])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E5088FC19
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:43:50 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com)
Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com
	(dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id
	mAMIhhDb038655; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 12:43:43 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com)
Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20081122124257.0267bc80@mail.computinginnovations.com>
X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 12:43:33 -0600
To: "Ansar Mohammed" <ansarm@gmail.com>, <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
From: Derek Ragona <derek@computinginnovations.com>
In-Reply-To: <001101c94bea$f6a94a50$e3fbdef0$@com>
References: <001101c94bea$f6a94a50$e3fbdef0$@com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 081121-0, 11/21/2008), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.94-exp/8663/Sat Nov 22 06:54:48 2008 on
	betty.computinginnovations.com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for
	more information
X-MailScanner-ID: mAMIhhDb038655
X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com
X-Spam-Status: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
Cc: 
Subject: Re: Kernel SMB performance
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:43:50 -0000

At 09:08 AM 11/21/2008, Ansar Mohammed wrote:
>Hello all
>
>We are considering using an application that uses FreeBSD web servers in
>front of Windows file servers. How reliable/scalable is the kernel SMB
>module?

You may want to use FreeNAS which is made for NAS using FreeBSD.

         -Derek

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.